Status
JEM-2025-1847 Original Research
Efficacy of Novel Immunotherapy Combinations in Treatment-Resistant Melanoma
Chen, Wei; Martinez, Sofia; Okonkwo, Chidi; Nakamura, Yuki; Thompson, David;
Submission Details
Date Submitted December 15, 2025
Article Type Original Research
Special Submission Invited — Special Collection on Immunotherapy Resistance
Subject Area Oncology / Immunotherapy
Specialty Medical oncology · Clinical trials · Translational immunology
Running Head Immunotherapy combinations in resistant melanoma
Handling Editor Dr. Sarah ChenYou
Associate Editors Dr. James WilsonYou 1st
Assigned 18 Dec 2025 · picked by Maria Hernandez
Dr. Elena Vasquez 2nd
Assigned 19 Dec 2025 · statistical lead
Days in Review 23 days
Cover Letter
Contact Author
Receives all author correspondence for this manuscript
Abstract
Background: Treatment-resistant melanoma remains a significant clinical challenge despite advances in immunotherapy. Combination approaches targeting multiple immune checkpoints have shown promise in preclinical studies but require rigorous clinical evaluation.

Methods: We conducted a multicenter, randomized, double-blind Phase II trial enrolling 312 patients with advanced melanoma who had progressed on prior anti-PD-1 therapy. Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to receive: (A) nivolumab plus ipilimumab, (B) nivolumab plus relatlimab, or (C) nivolumab plus experimental agent XYZ-4821. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and safety.

Results: At median follow-up of 18.3 months, median PFS was 4.2 months (arm A), 5.8 months (arm B), and 8.1 months (arm C). The combination of nivolumab plus XYZ-4821 demonstrated superior PFS compared to nivolumab plus ipilimumab (HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.44-0.87, p=0.006). Grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 42%, 28%, and 31% of patients in arms A, B, and C, respectively.

Conclusions: The novel combination of nivolumab plus XYZ-4821 showed improved efficacy with a manageable safety profile in treatment-resistant melanoma, warranting further investigation in Phase III trials.
Melanoma Immunotherapy Checkpoint inhibitors Combination therapy Treatment resistance Clinical trial
Authors & Affiliations
On behalf of the IMMUNE-X Investigators · click an author for details
Funding & Disclosures
Funding Sources
National Institutes of Health R01-CA234567 P30-CA008748
Melanoma Research Foundation MRF-2024-118
XYZ Pharmaceuticals Investigator-initiated Commercial
Conflicts of Interest W. Chen: Consulting fees from XYZ Pharmaceuticals, Bristol-Myers Squibb
S. Martinez: None declared
C. Okonkwo: Research funding from Merck
Y. Nakamura, D. Thompson: None declared
Companion Papers
JEM-2025-1902
Long-term safety follow-up of XYZ-4821 in treatment-resistant melanoma
Chen, Wei Companion — review together
Under Review
Companion papers are reviewed alongside this manuscript. Decisions are usually coordinated.
Custom Questions
experimentTrial registered: NCT04812793 campaignFlagged newsworthy imageIssue cover: vol 42, iss 6 help1 unanswered
3 Total Invited
1 Awaiting Response
1 Declined
flag Target: needed Due: Jan 15, 2026
Sets when this manuscript is ready for a decision
schedule
Dr. Sarah Kim hasn't responded in 20 days
Invitation sent Dec 18, 2025 • No reminder sent yet
Assigned Reviewers
person_add Invite Reviewer
groups General Reviewers 2 of 2 slots
MJ
Dr. Michael Johnson
Stanford University School of Medicine
assignment 0 other pending reviews
Invited Dec 18, 2025
Accepted Dec 20, 2025
Submitted Jan 3, 2026
Time in Review 14 days Position in decision letter #1
4
Originality
5
Methodology
4
Significance
3
Presentation
edit_note Minor Revision
Comments to Author
This is a well-designed Phase II trial addressing an important clinical question in treatment-resistant melanoma. The novel combination with XYZ-4821 shows promising efficacy signals. However, I have several suggestions for improvement:

1. The statistical analysis section needs clarification regarding the handling of patients who discontinued treatment early.

2. Figure 2 would benefit from including confidence intervals for the Kaplan-Meier curves.

3. The discussion should address the potential mechanisms underlying the observed differences in toxicity profiles between arms.
lock Confidential Comments to Editor
Overall, this is a solid manuscript that merits publication with minor revisions. The combination therapy shows genuine promise, and the data quality is high. My main concern is the relatively short follow-up period — I would recommend the authors include a note about planned long-term follow-up studies. I have no concerns about scientific integrity or ethical issues.
SK
Dr. Sarah Kim
Johns Hopkins Medicine
assignment 2 other pending reviews
Awaiting Response
Invited Dec 18, 2025
Response Pending (20 days) ⚠️
functions Statistical Reviewer 1 of 1 slot
EV
Dr. Elena Vasquez
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute — Biostatistics
assignment 1 other pending review
InvitedDec 18, 2025
AcceptedDec 19, 2025
SubmittedJan 6, 2026
Time in Review 18 days Position in decision letter #3
4
Analysis plan
3
Power
4
Reporting
edit_note Minor Revision
Comments to Author
The statistical approach is appropriate and the primary analysis is correctly specified. Two requests: report the sensitivity analysis for early discontinuation as a pre-specified vs. post-hoc distinction, and state the power calculation assumptions for the XYZ-4821 arm explicitly.
person_off Declined / withdrawn
RP
Dr. Robert Patel
MD Anderson Cancer Center
Declined
Invited Dec 16, 2025
Declined Dec 17, 2025 — "Conflict of interest"
Author Nominations
from submission — reviewers & editors
thumb_up Suggested by authors
Dr. Sarah Kim
Johns Hopkins Medicine
check Already invited · Dec 18
Dr. Elena Vasquez
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
block Opposed by authors — do not invite
Dr. Thomas Reed
Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine
"Directly competing TIM-3 combination trial program"
thumb_up Editors suggested by authors
Dr. Anne Vogel
Editorial Board — Immuno-Oncology
"Subject expertise in checkpoint combinations"
block Editors opposed by authors — do not assign
Dr. Martin Rees
Editorial Board — Translational Oncology
"Prior dispute over authorship on a related trial"
Manuscript Files
picture_as_pdf
JEM-2025-1847_Manuscript.pdf
2.4 MB • v1.0 • Uploaded by Wei Chen (Author) Dec 15, 2025
description
JEM-2025-1847_Manuscript_Source.docx
856 KB • v1.0 • Uploaded by Wei Chen (Author) Dec 15, 2025
draft
Cover_Letter.pdf
124 KB • v1.0 • Uploaded by Wei Chen (Author) Dec 15, 2025
Figures & Tables
image
Figure_1_StudyDesign.tiff
4.8 MB • 300 DPI • v1.0 • Uploaded by Wei Chen (Author) Dec 15, 2025
image
Figure_2_KaplanMeier_PFS.tiff
3.2 MB • 300 DPI • v1.0 • Uploaded by Wei Chen (Author) Dec 15, 2025
table_chart
Table_1_PatientCharacteristics.xlsx
48 KB • v1.0 • Uploaded by Wei Chen (Author) Dec 15, 2025
Supplementary Materials
picture_as_pdf
Supplementary_Appendix.pdf
1.1 MB • v1.0 • Uploaded by Wei Chen (Author) Dec 15, 2025
database
Clinical_Trial_Data.csv
892 KB • v1.0 • Uploaded by Wei Chen (Author) Dec 15, 2025
Workflow Files
added during review
Review Files
No files in this category
Recommendation Files
No files in this category
Decision Files
No files in this category
Upload with designation
gpp_maybe
3 signals across 2 checks
Last updated 4 Jan 2026 · not visible to authors or reviewers
Unusual Activity
Unusual Activity Detection
Submitting computer has been linked to multiple submissions and/or reviews by different authors
Report generated 21:02, 4 Jan 2026 by a submission event · Document ID 64169768
A flag is not a finding of misconduct. Review the linked submissions, then decide whether this manuscript should proceed.
Action this submission?
Similarity
iThenticate
Demo state
12%
Overall Similarity Index
No concentrated overlap with any single prior publication
Duplicate Submission Check
run 15 Dec 2025
Searches other submissions to this site and scores relevancy on the manuscript title and on the full author list. Highest combined relevancy first.
ManuscriptTitle matchAuthor matchStatus
JEM-2024-0912 18% 80% Rejected after review, Aug 2024
JEM-2023-1105 11% 60% Published Mar 2024
High author overlap with low title overlap is expected for a research group publishing repeatedly — not itself a duplicate signal.
Editor Notes
lock Notes are only visible to editors and editorial staff
MH
Maria Hernandez
Dec 16, 2025 at 9:15 AM
push_pin Pinned Word count exceeded — author notified
Initial submission was 1,200 words over the limit. Contacted author on Dec 16 to request shortened version. Author confirmed they will revise and resubmit by Dec 20.
SC
Dr. Sarah Chen
Dec 18, 2025 at 3:45 PM
Backup reviewers identified
If current reviewers don't respond by Dec 28, consider inviting:
• Dr. Amanda Foster (UCLA) — reviewed similar immunotherapy paper last year
• Dr. Raj Patel (Cleveland Clinic) — expertise in melanoma trials
JW
Dr. James Wilson
Dec 15, 2025 at 10:22 AM
Initial assessment
Strong methodology and promising results. The XYZ-4821 combination data is particularly interesting. Recommend expedited review given potential clinical impact. Authors have good track record with this journal.
Version History
Version Date Submitted Decision Decision letter & response Files
JEM-2025-1847 Current Dec 15, 2025 Under Review View Files
JEM-2025-1847.R1 Sep 2, 2025 Major Revision View Files
JEM-2025-1847.R0 Jun 11, 2025 Minor Revision View Files
Activity Log
rate_review
Review Submitted Jan 3, 2026 at 2:45 PM
Dr. Michael Johnson submitted their review. Recommendation: Minor Revision.
View Review arrow_forward
mail
Reminder Sent Dec 28, 2025 at 9:00 AM
Automated reminder sent to Dr. Sarah Kim regarding pending invitation response.
Email Opened Dec 20, 2025 at 11:28 AM
Dr. Michael Johnson opened the invitation email.
Email Link Clicked Dec 20, 2025 at 11:30 AM
Dr. Michael Johnson clicked "Accept Invitation" link.
check
Reviewer Accepted Dec 20, 2025 at 11:32 AM
Dr. Michael Johnson accepted the review invitation. Due date: Jan 10, 2026.
person_add
Reviewers Invited Dec 18, 2025 at 3:15 PM
Review invitations sent to Dr. Michael Johnson and Dr. Sarah Kim.
By Dr. Sarah Chen
close
Reviewer Declined Dec 17, 2025 at 4:22 PM
Dr. Robert Patel declined the review invitation. Reason: Conflict of interest.
Email Opened Dec 17, 2025 at 4:20 PM
Dr. Robert Patel opened the invitation email.
person_add
Reviewer Invited Dec 16, 2025 at 10:08 AM
Review invitation sent to Dr. Robert Patel.
By Dr. Sarah Chen
error
Email Bounced Dec 15, 2025 at 6:45 PM
Invitation email to Dr. Anna Martinez bounced. Invalid email address.
assignment_ind
Editor Assigned Dec 15, 2025 at 4:30 PM
Manuscript assigned to Dr. Sarah Chen (Editor-in-Chief) with Dr. James Wilson as Associate Editor.
upload_file
Manuscript Submitted Dec 15, 2025 at 2:18 PM
Original submission received from Wei Chen (corresponding author).
View Submission Details arrow_forward
forward_to_inbox Log correspondence sent or received outside ScholarOne
Phone calls, direct emails, and conversations at meetings can be recorded here so the trail stays complete.
mail Email Author
picture_as_pdf Manuscript PDF
Page 1 of 24
Efficacy of Novel Immunotherapy Combinations in Treatment-Resistant Melanoma: A Multi-Center Randomized Controlled Trial
Wei Chen1,2*, Sofia Martinez1, Chidi Okonkwo3, Yuki Nakamura4, David Thompson1
ABSTRACT
Background: Treatment-resistant melanoma remains a significant clinical challenge despite advances in immunotherapy. This study evaluates the efficacy of novel combination immunotherapy regimens in patients who have failed first-line treatment.

Methods: We conducted a multi-center, randomized controlled trial involving 342 patients with treatment-resistant stage III/IV melanoma across 28 academic medical centers. Patients were randomized to receive either combination anti-PD-1/anti-CTLA-4 therapy with a novel TIM-3 inhibitor (n=171) or standard combination therapy (n=171).

Results: The primary endpoint of progression-free survival was significantly improved in the experimental arm (median 11.2 months vs 6.8 months; HR 0.58; 95% CI 0.44-0.76; p<0.001). Overall response rate was 48% in the experimental arm compared to 31% in the control arm (p=0.002). Grade 3-4 adverse events were comparable between groups.

Conclusions: The addition of TIM-3 inhibition to standard combination immunotherapy significantly improves outcomes in treatment-resistant melanoma with an acceptable safety profile. These findings support further investigation in earlier treatment settings.
Demo stage
check_circle